Vol66 remembered watching orange collide with crimson when the game looked less like a televised sporting event and more like two armies settling a border dispute.
“That is how this game is supposed to look. Orange and crimson. You should be able to turn the television on with the sound off and immediately know that somebody’s grandfather is about to get angry.”
For decades, Tennessee-Alabama has been known as the Third Saturday in October.
It has survived coaching changes, conference expansion, divisional realignment, declining cigarette consumption and CBS commercials long enough to qualify as geological time.
Now it would regain something important:
Both sides would dress for the funeral.
RockyTopBill became emotional:
“My daddy took me to this game when I was nine years old. Tennessee wore orange. Alabama wore crimson. The leaves were turning, the band was playing and two men got into a fistfight over a parking space before breakfast. That was October.”
He paused before adding:
“We have lost so much.”
Nobody asked what else had been lost.
The thread already understood.
This was not about jerseys.
It was about fathers, sons, cold mornings, radio broadcasts, cigar smoke and the annual discovery that a person could hate the entire state of Alabama while maintaining cordial relations with three cousins who lived there.
Then the anger arrived.
A staff member explained that the arrangement could have happened years earlier, but Nick Saban had refused to agree to it.
The board immediately indicted him.
VFLinDalton wrote:
“That miserable little tyrant controlled everything. Recruiting. Officiating. Scheduling. Now we find out he controlled shirt colors too.”
ThirdAndChavis agreed:
“The man had seven national championships and still couldn’t let Tennessee wear orange. That tells you everything you need to know about him.”
It did not tell anyone everything they needed to know about him.
It did not even establish why he objected.
But message-board court was already in session, and the defendant had chosen retirement rather than appear.
PorchVol delivered the sentence:
“He feared the orange.”
This possibility was examined seriously.
Perhaps Saban believed Tennessee looked faster in orange. Perhaps crimson and orange together created a visual confusion that benefited quarterbacks. Perhaps he simply understood that Tennessee fans wanted it and had spent seventeen years denying them small pleasures as part of a broader psychological campaign.
Foust offered another theory:
“Could be that a quarterback has one one-hundredth of a second to distinguish jerseys. Orange against white is easier than orange against crimson.”
Nobody knew whether this was medically, athletically or chromatically true.
Within minutes, three posters were discussing peripheral vision, cone receptors and the reaction time of SEC linebackers.
RockyTopBill claimed to have a color-blind uncle who could “see motion better than most people.”
The uncle was briefly considered and confirmed as a source.
Then VolsVF91 returned the thread to its central purpose:
“GFY, Nick Saban.”
The comment received 237 likes and brought the scientific inquiry to an end.
One poster admitted the sight of orange and crimson together had produced a physical response generally inappropriate for a uniform discussion.
Nobody condemned him.
This was the Third Saturday in October. Medical privacy remained important.
Then, as often happens when Tennessee supporters become overwhelmed by history, the board summoned its oldest bull elephant.
BullsgapVol had not commented.
This concerned everyone.
For nearly an hour, posters celebrated, cursed Saban, remembered their fathers and debated whether orange was visually closer to crimson than red.
Still, the old bull remained silent.
BullsgapVol is not merely an older poster. Tennessee boards contain hundreds of those—men who remember Johnny Majors, claim to remember George Cafego, despise alternate uniforms and corporate patches, and believe every third-down defense should involve hitting somebody with a folding chair.
BullsgapVol stands above them.
He has seen the wars.
He attended Tennessee when defensive players had summer jobs, helmets contained less padding than modern shipping envelopes and “NIL” would have been interpreted as a disappointing rushing total.
He maintains spreadsheets documenting Tennessee history back to the era when coaches wore neckties and dehydration was considered evidence of character.
When BullsgapVol speaks, other posters do not reply.
They gather.
At 3:14 p.m., he finally entered the thread:
“Some of us have waited a very long time to see this made right.”
That was all.
No year.
No anecdote.
No explanation of what had been wrong or who had wronged it.
The board became silent before the words.
Several posters thanked him.
One wrote:
“This hits different coming from you, sir.”
Another replied:
“People who didn’t live through those years will never understand.”
The person posting this was 34.
Ten minutes later, BullsgapVol returned with a photograph from 1970 and a spreadsheet labeled TENNESSEE-ALABAMA UNIFORM COMBINATIONS, 1928–2025.
The spreadsheet contained 97 rows, four shades of orange and a column titled “Properness.”
Nobody knew how Properness was calculated.
The 1970 game received a 9.6.
The 2009 game received a 4.2.
Two games had been marked “Spiritual violation.”
The numbers were based on memory, grievance and air, but they contained decimals, which made them analytics.
A poster asked whether BullsgapVol had always preferred both teams wearing home colors.
He answered:
“There was a time when nobody had to ask.”
The board nearly collapsed under the weight of it.
Men stared through office windows.
A retired dentist in Cleveland poured two fingers of bourbon.
Somewhere in East Tennessee, a grandfather opened a closet and touched an orange jacket that had not fit since the Clinton administration.
For one afternoon, the message board was united.
The traditionalists loved the history.
The younger fans loved the appearance.
The uniform obsessives began producing mockups.
The Saban haters discovered one final charge to add to an indictment already longer than the Appalachian Trail.
Even the board’s contrarians could find only one objection:
“Hope Adidas gets the orange right.”
They will not, of course.
Someone will complain that Tennessee’s orange appears too pale beneath the stadium lights. Someone else will insist Alabama’s crimson looks burgundy on his television. A third poster will blame ESPN’s cameras, and BullsgapVol will produce a chart comparing broadcast color temperatures since 1972.
That argument can wait.
For now, Tennessee will wear orange.
Alabama will wear crimson.
The leaves will turn. The cigars will appear. Old men will remember games that were probably colder, tougher and more meaningful than they actually were.
And somewhere above the noise, the old bull elephant will nod.
The colors are back where they belong.
So is the hatred.
Leave a Reply